ISO 17025 Risk Management: Ensuring Laboratory Competence and Consistency

ISO 17025 Risk management is an essential component of maintaining accreditation for laboratories under ISO/IEC 17025. This international standard specifies the general requirements for the competence to carry out tests and calibrations, including sampling. It breaches the conceptual gap between maintaining high standards and providing a framework through which laboratories can demonstrate consistent operation and the ability to generate valid results, thereby promoting confidence in their work both nationally and internationally.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 introduced a stronger emphasis on risk-based thinking. Laboratories are now required to identify and assess risks and opportunities associated with their activities. Documenting risks and opportunities is key in ensuring the laboratory practicing risk-based thinking. This can easily be accomplished by using an ISO 17025 risk and opportunities template.

This risk-based thinking process involves a series of strategic steps: establishing a context for risk, identification, analysis and evaluation, and the treatment of these risks. The aim is not just to mitigate adverse outcomes but to capitalize on opportunities that could improve laboratory operations. There are several sections of the ISO/IEC standard that incorporate risk-based thinking, however, section 8.5 specifically addresses “Actions to address Risk and Opportunities”.

Key Takeaways

• ISO/IEC 17025:2017 sets the stage for laboratories to adopt risk management processes.
• Risk management is integral for laboratories to maintain ISO 17025 accreditation and enhance confidence in their work.
• Implementation of a risk management system is a proactive approach to identifying, evaluating, and mitigating potential risks in laboratory operations.

Understanding ISO 17025 Risk Management

To get a detailed overview of the requirements set in ISO/IEC 17025:2017 section 8.5, Addressing Risk and Opportunities, watch the PJLA webinar below. It will break down the requirements in complete detail. It is definitely worth watching all the way through.

ISO/IEC 17025:2017 sets the global benchmark for testing and calibration laboratories intending to demonstrate their operational capability and quality management system integrity. This international standard underscores a commitment to excellence and consistency in laboratory processes.

Key Changes in the 2017 Revision of ISO/IEC 17025

In 2015, the general quality management standard, ISO 9001 introduced the idea of risk based thinking. It also introduced the general question, what is risk based thinking in ISO 9001? This change initiated other standard to also embrace this risk-based thinking approach. The 2017 revision of ISO/IEC 17025 brought significant updates, emphasizing risk-based thinking and technological advancements. The changes include:

1. Integration of a risk-based approach, aligning with contemporary quality management principles and providing a framework for laboratories to preemptively identify and mitigate potential risks.
2. A shift towards a more flexible structure to accommodate the integration of new technologies, adapting to the changing landscape of testing and calibration practices.
3. Enhanced compatibility with ISO 9001, driving a commitment to continuous improvement and customer satisfaction by focusing on the efficiency of operations and the quality of output.

The Importance of Aligning with ISO 9001

Aligning ISO/IEC 17025:2017 with ISO 9001 presents numerous benefits:

• Continual Improvement: Laboratories aligning with ISO 9001 principles engage in an ongoing process of review and quality enhancement, assuring reliability and efficiency.
• International Recognition: Adhering to ISO 9001 enhances global recognition and trust, illustrating a laboratory’s commitment to high-quality results and management excellence.

By aligning with ISO 9001, laboratories not only improve their internal workflows but also reinforce customer confidence in their services. Risk management is now in most of the ISO standards, including risk management in ISO 13485, for example, and, of course, ISO 9001.

Risk-Based Management in ISO/IEC 17025

The inclusion of risk-based thinking in the ISO/IEC 17025 standard emphasizes the proactive identification and mitigation of risks within laboratory environments, necessitating a systematic approach to manage potential issues impacting the quality and reliability of testing and calibration.

Explanation of Risk-Based Management

Risk-based management within ISO/IEC 17025 is a methodical approach that focuses on identifying and managing risks related to laboratory operations. It is designed to increase the likelihood of achieving specified objectives, ensure reliability of results, and reduce the likelihood and impact of negative outcomes. Laboratories that implement this approach are required to consider the uncertainties they encounter and establish procedures to reduce risks.

Risk management in this context is not a single task, but an ongoing process integrated into the laboratory’s overall management system. The risk-based approach requires laboratories to evaluate the probability (likelihood) and impact (consequence) of potential risks, which could affect the integrity of their operational processes and the accuracy of their test and calibration results.

The Process of Identifying and Assessing Laboratory Operational Risks

The first step in risk management within an ISO/IEC 17025 laboratory is Risk Identification. During this stage, laboratories must list all potential problems that could compromise their activities, considering various aspects such as technical competence, equipment functionality, and external factors.

1. Identify Risks: Collate potential risks related to laboratory processes.
2. Categorize Risks: Organize identified risks according to relevant classifications (e.g., operational, financial, strategic).
3. Document Risks: Create a comprehensive record of the identified risks.

Risk Assessment follows as the next critical phase, where laboratories assess identified risks to establish risk levels. This entails:

• Analyzing Risks: Determine the likelihood of occurrence and the associated impact.
• Evaluating Risks: Prioritize risks based on the assessed risk levels.
• Developing a Risk Matrix: Probability Impact Risk Level High High High Medium High Medium Low High Medium High Low Medium Low Low Low

In doing so, laboratories can prioritize efforts on managing risks with higher levels of probability and impact, ensuring that they manage risks effectively and uphold the integrity and accuracy of their results through a sound calibration and testing process. On the management side of things, even preparing for the ISO 17025 accreditation audit can be considered in the risk management process.

The Five Requirements of ISO 17025

ISO 17025 sets out requirements ensuring competence and consistent operation in laboratories. This international standard applies a process approach with risk-based thinking and emphasizes the importance of adequate resources, personnel, and documentation to maintain a high level of calibration and testing quality over time.

Discussion of the Five Essential Requirements of ISO 17025

1. Scope and application: Laboratories must define their range of activities and ensure that the management system is applied to all operations within this scope.
2. Normative references: Laboratories are required to identify and adhere to relevant normative documents that affect their ability to fulfill the ISO 17025 requirements consistently.
3. Terms and definitions: A clear understanding and application of appropriate terms as defined under ISO 17025 are vital for effective communication and compliance.
4. Management requirements: These requirements focus on the actions necessary to monitor, maintain, and improve the management system. Key components include the control of documents, review of contracts, handling of complaints, control of nonconforming work, and management reviews.
5. Technical requirements: ISO 17025 prescribes technical requirements that ensure the competence of staff, the ISO 17025 equipment and calibration requirements, and adequate testing methodologies. It also mandates the monitoring of performance through requirements for sampling, handling of test and calibration items, and the quality assurance of results.

By adhering to these essential requirements, laboratories demonstrate their capability to generate valid results, fostering confidence in their work both nationally and internationally.

Risk Management Strategies in ISO 17025

Risk management within the ISO 17025 framework is crucial for laboratories to maintain quality and competence in their calibration and testing processes. This section presents a concise guide and concrete examples to assist laboratories in implementing risk management effectively.

Step-by-Step Guide to Implementing Risk Management in Laboratories

ISO 17025 emphasizes a structured approach towards risk management to enhance the reliability and efficiency of laboratory operations. To implement risk management, laboratories should:

1. Establish Context: Define the scope, objectives, and criteria for risk levels within the laboratory context.
2. Risk Identification: Compile a comprehensive list of potential risks that could impact the laboratory’s operations.
3. Risk Analysis and Evaluation: Assess the impact and probability of each identified risk, and categorize them according to risk levels.
4. Risk Treatment: Plan and apply suitable actions to mitigate, accept, transfer, or avoid risks based on their assessment.
5. Monitoring and Review: Continuously monitor risks and the effectiveness of treatment actions, adjusting strategies as necessary.

By following these steps, laboratories can embed risk management into their quality systems, aligning with ISO 17025 requirements.

Examples of Risk Identification, Risk Estimation, and Risk Characterization

• Risk Identification Example: A laboratory identifies the potential for equipment malfunction leading to inaccurate calibration results.
• Risk Estimation: The laboratory evaluates the probability of equipment failure (e.g., rare, likely, almost certain) and its impact on operations (e.g., minor, moderate, major).
• Risk Characterization: Characteristics of the risk, such as its likelihood, impact, and velocity, are combined to prioritize the risk for treatment.

For instance, if the probability of malfunction is ‘likely’ and the impact is ‘major’, a high priority is assigned for risk treatment actions. The lab then determines and implements the most appropriate actions, such as preventive maintenance schedules or acquiring backup equipment, underpinned by the ISO 17025 risk management process.

Key Components of ISO 17025

ISO 17025 is pivotal in ensuring laboratories adhere to a high standard of quality and competence through robust risk management.

Overview of the Key Components of ISO 17025 and Their Relation to Risk Management

ISO 17025 encompasses key components fundamental for testing and calibration laboratories to manage risks effectively. These components underpin a laboratory’s ability to perform competently and generate reliable results, while aligning with the standard’s emphasis on a continuous quality improvement paradigm.

Competence: Laboratories must demonstrate that they have qualified personnel with the necessary skills and knowledge. This includes ongoing training and assessment to maintain a high level of expertise.

Technology and Calibration: Advanced technologies and proper calibration under ISO 17025 are critical for accurate measurements. Laboratories are required to use validated methods and maintain equipment in accordance with specified standards.

Internal Audits: Regular internal audits are essential for identifying areas of potential risk within laboratory operations. These audits allow for the prompt addressing of issues.

Monitoring: Continual monitoring of processes and outputs is crucial to detect variations and implement corrective measures proactively.

Documentation: Comprehensive documentation is mandated to ensure traceability and accountability. Records must be well-maintained for all activities and analyses.

Impartiality: Laboratories must operate with impartiality to avoid conflicts of interest and ensure objectivity in testing and calibration results.

Risk Management: Identifying and mitigating risks is a perpetual process in ISO 17025. Laboratories must evaluate the potential impact on the quality of their work and take appropriate actions to minimize risks.

Each of these components works in cohesion, ensuring that resources are allocated effectively and that a laboratory’s outputs are of consistent quality, thus instilling confidence in clients and stakeholders.

Evaluating and Addressing Risks

Evaluating and addressing risks are pivotal to the ISO 17025 framework to ensure reliability and safety in laboratory operations. It necessitates a systematic approach, often inspired by the principles outlined in ISO 31000 for risk management.

Methodologies for Risk Evaluation in Laboratories

The methodologies for risk evaluation in laboratories are governed by structured processes. It is crucial for laboratories to adopt a model that not only identifies risks but also estimates their probability and impact. The evaluation process often involves the following steps:

1. Risk Identification: Recognizing potential risks that could affect laboratory processes or outputs.
2. Risk Analysis: Determining the nature of risks and considering the likelihood and consequences of their occurrence.
3. Risk Evaluation: Comparing the level of risk against predetermined criteria to prioritize the risks that require mitigation.

Laboratories frequently review and update their risk evaluation to reflect changes in both internal operations and external factors. They may use qualitative, quantitative, or a combination of both methods to assess risk levels.

• Qualitative methods involve descriptions and are helpful in scenarios where numerical data is limited.
• Quantitative methods are data-driven and provide a statistical probability of risk, often yielding more precise information for decision-making.

In every step of risk evaluation, it is crucial for laboratory personnel to be involved and for the methodologies to be aligned with the overall objectives of the ISO 17025 standard.

Frequently Asked Questions

The following questions address key aspects of ISO 17025 Risk Management, providing insight into its implementation and requirements for laboratory operations.

How can one implement risk-based management according to ISO/IEC 17025?

Laboratories implement risk-based management by first establishing risk management policy and objectives. Next, they identify risks and opportunities that could impact laboratory activities, assess the importance of these risks, and take actions to mitigate or capitalize on them.

What are the processes for addressing risks and opportunities in accordance with ISO 17025?

The process involves identifying potential risks and opportunities, evaluating their impact on laboratory operations, and prioritizing them. Laboratories then develop and implement plans to address these risks and opportunities, integrating these actions into the laboratory’s management system.

Can you outline the five main requirements of ISO 17025 regarding laboratory operations?

ISO 17025 requires laboratories to: establish a quality management system, ensure staff competency and proper equipment, maintain procedure validity, consistently apply suitable testing and calibration methods, and maintain impartiality and confidentiality in their operations.

What is involved in the procedure for conducting a risk assessment as per ISO 17025 guidelines?

Conducting a risk assessment entails identifying potential risks, analyzing their consequences, and evaluating the likelihood of their occurrence. Subsequently, laboratories determine the level of risk and prioritize risk mitigation measures based on this evaluation.

Are there examples of risks and opportunities assessments templates available for ISO 17025 adherence?

Yes, there are templates and tools available that help laboratories to systematically assess risks and opportunities. These templates provide a structured approach to documenting identified risks, potential effects, and proposed mitigation strategies.

What are the best practices for laboratory risk assessments in chemical labs under ISO 17025:2017?

Best practices include regularly reviewing risk management processes, engaging all staff in risk identification, employing both qualitative and quantitative risk analysis methods, documenting all processes, and maintaining open communication regarding potential risks and opportunities.